 |
THIS
STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY VIEWING |
Pouring on the salt
increases fiscal pain
Author: Sandy
Coleman
Boston Globe Staff
Published on December 16, 2004
When a purchasing cooperative for area
communities sought bids last spring for road salt, the
outcome was unusual the group rejected all five contract
proposals.
Survey tracks how much area communities
spent on road salt last year. "They were too high,"
said Lara Thomas, regional administrator of the Southeastern
Regional Services Group. "They ranged from $42.47
a ton to $68 a ton."
The cooperative learned early about what
many local highway supervisors say they still can't
get used to the steep hike in the price of road salt
this year. Local officials say they have seen price
increases ranging from $10 to $20 per ton, which could
result in large road budget deficits if the winter is
severe.
Public works officials are looking for
new ways to save money. East Bridgewater, for instance,
is among at least 25 municipalities in the state that
plan to use a Hungarian-inspired salt mix called Magic
Salt, which is rock salt treated with a syrupy solution
that helps it stick to the pavement better and last
longer than untreated salt. The idea is that less salt
would be needed, resulting in savings, said John Haines,
East Bridgewater's highway surveyor.
"I haven't used it yet. But because
of the increased cost of salt, you'll see people looking
at different alternatives, and you experiment,"
said Haines, who is paying $41.66 per ton for road salt
this year, versus last year's $32.
But most communities in the area will
face winter with regular road salt, and try to deal
with the unexpected jump in their cost of keeping local
roads clear of snow and ice.
Last winter, Stoughton officials paid
about $29 a ton; this winter, it's $41 a ton, said Larry
Barrett, the town's public works superintendent. Stoughton
used 3,449 tons of salt last winter, at a cost of $102,867.
The same amount would cost $41,000 more this winter.
Rob Zora, Marion's Department of Public
Works superintendent, said that when he saw his price
for salt had jumped from $34.13 a ton to $53.42 a ton,
"I got sticker shock."
But, Zora said, "it is what it is,
and we are committed because we need the salt."
Fortunately for him, Marion has relatively
few miles of road to salt compared with other towns.
The town used 175 tons of salt last year, spending $5,972.
Big municipalities like Brockton that have hundreds
of miles of major travel arteries are harder hit by
the price hike. Last winter, Brockton used 10,000 tons
of salt and spent $375,000, according to David Bloodsworth,
the mayor's spokesman.
No one is calling for increases in snow
removal budgets, which are traditionally set lower than
actual spending. By state law, the snow removal budget
is the only one that municipalities can allow to operate
in a deficit. Town officials are allowed to roll over
the deficit into the next fiscal year, and subtract
it from revenues.
At the state level, legislators this year
appropriated $35 million for snow removal instead of
the usual $15 million. Massachusetts Highway Department
officials had been pushing to increase its snow and
ice allocation because the budget always exceeds the
$15 million, said Jon Carlisle, a MassHighway spokesman.
The five-year average for snow and ice spending is about
$56 million a year, he said.
MassHighway takes care of all state and
interstate roads. This winter, MassHighway officials
are paying $34.60 a ton for salt, which is about $10
a ton more than last year's price, according to Judith
Forman, a MassHighway spokeswoman.
The reason for the escalating salt prices
is partly due to the development boom taking place in
China and India, according to industry experts and salt
suppliers.
"You can't pick up the paper without
reading [about] the growth rate of China and India,"
said Bill Creighton, general manager of Granite State
Minerals, a salt supplier in Portsmouth, N.H. "For
these countries to feed their growth rate, they are
buying up everything in the world, from salt to steel
to cement. The demand for these items has outstripped
the supply."
Higher transportation costs also have
contributed to the prices, said Richard I. Hanneman,
president of the Salt Institute, a nonprofit association
of salt producers based in Alexandria, Va. Many salt
mines are located outside the United States the bulk
of them in South America and the demand for ocean shipping
has pushed up the cost of moving freight. Also, higher
fuel costs have increased trucking prices, he said.
"It's always been [this way] with
salt the majority of the cost is transportation,"
said Creighton.
Although the salt prices have jumped, Zora and other
highway superintendents in the region say they can't
change their approach to salting roadways.
"The priority is to get the roads
safe. Money comes second," said Barrett. "No
one jumps up and says, `Great, you saved us money on
snow.' They'll jump up if the roads aren't safe."
Harry Sylvester, Hingham's Department
of Public Works superintendent, agrees: "If you
don't salt, you're setting up for disaster, and then
car insurance [premiums] would go up."
Even if highway officials tried to scrimp
on salt usage, they would have to use more sand to compensate
and end up not saving money, said Sylvester. And using
more sand would pose another financial problem, because
the sand has to be swept up and disposed of in the spring.
Appropriate disposal costs money.
In Plymouth, public works director George
Crombie said he is focusing on better management of
salt and sand usage for environmental as well as economic
reasons this year. All of the town's spreaders are being
fitted with automated calibrators that determine the
amount of sand and salt to use on roads, instead of
leaving it up to the operators to handle manually, he
said.
Paying closer attention to the variables
that go into salt and sand usage, such as weather forecasts,
is also important, he said.
"We're trying to cut our [salt] usage
this year by 10 percent. That's worth about $55,000.
But, managing salt and sand doesn't mean compromising
safety," he said.
© Copyright 2004 The New
York Times Company |